REAL EFFECTS OF PROPAGANDA

 
This report explores the perspectives of Australian judicial officers on domestic and family violence (DFV) perpetrator interventions. Drawing on in-depth interviews with judges, magistrates, and key stakeholders across all Australian states and territories, the study examines how judicial officers understand and apply perpetrator interventions, including sentencing, family violence intervention orders (FVIOs), and behaviour change programs. The research identifies key challenges, such as inconsistencies in judicial responses, limited knowledge of intervention program availability, and barriers to court monitoring of compliance. Findings highlight the need for better integration of perpetrator interventions within the criminal justice system, increased judicial education on DFV interventions, and clearer national frameworks to improve perpetrator accountability. The report provides recommendations for judicial training, improved access to intervention programs, and the development of a national online register of available perpetrator intervention services. 

Issues Raised 1.

Fitness for Interview Assessment

The document discusses an email exchange where questions were raised about whether Jake/Reece was assessed for 'fitness for interview' before or after the interview with the police. There are discrepancies and concerns about the timing and nature of this assessment, which may impact the validity of subsequent legal proceedings. 2.

Medical Assessment and Treatment

There are allegations that the medical assessments conducted by Austin Health, particularly related to mental health assessments, were not properly conducted or documented. Jake/Reece raises concerns about falsification of medical records and discrepancies between different health professionals' assessments. 3.

Legal Rights Violations

Jake/Reece claims that he was not adequately informed of his legal rights during his time in police custody and subsequent court proceedings. Allegations include denial of access to legal advice, failure to provide documentation related to bail, and procedural irregularities during court appearances. 4.

Conditions of Confinement

Concerns are raised about the conditions of confinement during Jake/Reece's time in custody, including solitary confinement, denial of medication, and general mistreatment, which may have exacerbated his mental health condition. 5.

Procedural Irregularities

There are allegations of procedural irregularities during court appearances, including lack of instructions and clarity during hearings conducted via video link, potentially affecting the fairness of legal proceedings. 

Whether accusations of treason against the Commissioner of Victoria Police and Ministers for Police and Justice, based on alleged contravention of constitutional provisions (specifically sections 51(xxiv),51(xxv), 51(xxix), 51(xxxvi), 51(xxxix), 52, 61, 106-109, 117-119 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act), constitute valid legal claims and if such claims can be pursued through judicial review.

55. Now I wonder what being a vulnerable person would have meant and if I would have still been placed in

prison from April 28, 2022, to May 26, 2022, a total of 26 days.

56. When I go back to the remand/bail application to the ‘child, vulnerable or Aboriginal person’ and replace

the crossed ‘no’ box with a cross indicating ‘yes’, it says the ‘accused MUST be brought before a Bail

Justice as soon as practicable.’ (original emphasis)

57. Sgt White enters ‘The accused is currently unemployed. The accused has one dependant, an 8 year

old son who he does no reside with. The accused is currently struggling with finances and stated will

soon be living out of his vehicle again. The accused is struggling financially and mentally’ in the

personal details of the accused on page 3.

58. There are two important facts here. First, we, the AFM and I were party to the final Family Law orders

dated October 24, 2018, by consent before Judge Baker. The orders state, ‘1. The parents have

equal shared parental responsibility for the child... 2. Pending his commencement at primary school

in 2019, the child shall live equally between the parents on a fortnightly rotating schedule…’

(emphasis added)

CONSPIRACY — General principles — Co-conspirator’s rule — Relevant public interests - Balancing

of public interests. Application for permanent stay — Forensic disadvantage — Whether fair trial

possible — Whether stay should be granted

DISMISSAL IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE — Meaning of interests of justice — Onus of proof —

Nature of relief — Whether factors relevant to dismissal must be related to conspiracy charges —

Aiding and abetting — Commission by proxy

STAY OF PROCEEDINGS — Abuse of process — Right to a fair trial — Deficiencies or malpractice in

investigation — Accumulation of errors

CRIMINAL LAW — Evidence — Illegally obtained evidence — Discretion to exclude — Conspiracy to

Commit a Crime - Aid and Abet

HUMAN RIGHTS - Right to fair hearing - Equality before the law — Right to liberty and security —Freedom from arbitrary interference with family — Protection of families and children — Limitations

Root cause analysis of Victoria Police corruption and defiance of the High Court ruling AB v CD [2018]